3 ms·
Okay, but why can you transcribe everything that's said and literally paint portraits of the proceedings, but you can't use a tape recorder? Surely the gains in
by CobrastanJorji 3y ago
Okay, but why can you transcribe everything that's said and literally paint portraits of the proceedings, but you can't use a tape recorder? Surely the gains in public access and accurate record keeping from an audio recording outweigh whatever extra intrusiveness audio has over text?
- JohnFen 3y agoAh, you're talking about during an actual court proceeding? I was thinking just in the courthouse/police station/etc. generally. In an actual court proceeding, things might be a bit different. In my state, anyway, the court itself makes audio and video recording of the proceeding and prohibits others from doing so. I'm OK with that, but I wouldn't have a huge issue if they allowed others to do it too. Outside of a court proceeding, though, I have a larger issue.