> Also, there are enough people meticulous enough to follow up on the sources. There's an insidious aspect to Wikipedia's reliance on verifiability: any wild c

> Also, there are enough people meticulous enough to follow up on the sources. There's an insidious aspect to Wikipedia's reliance on verifiability: any wild claim can be posted, repeated by third parties, and afterwards have Wikipedia refer to those third parties as sources. I know this to be a fact because I read a Wikipedia article on the subject. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_citogenesis_incidents https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_citogenesi...