3 ms·
>So clearly subscriptions don’t pay the bills Wrong, you've failed to read the post you replied to. They paid the bills and even had steady growth. Corporate g
by skeaker 3y ago
>So clearly subscriptions don’t pay the bills
Wrong, you've failed to read the post you replied to. They paid the bills and even had steady growth. Corporate got greedy and wanted MORE growth which was unrealistic.
- tinus_hn 3y agoThe post I replied to claimed subscriptions were ‘moneymakers’. That’s obvious, it’s literally people paying money to be a subscriber. What’s not obvious is if they pay the bills. Chances are that like in most forms of media they don’t. Just like newspapers still have ads because subscriptions don’t pay the bills. But hey, you’re free to try to set up your own channel completely funded by subscriptions! Good luck! Perhaps the talent that left this channel will even join your channel. If those subscriptions bring in enough money to pay them of course.