> idea that any observable behaviors between genders is due to the nature of genders themselves. > This is the nature of misogyny. The invalid logical implicat

> idea that any observable behaviors between genders is due to the nature of genders themselves. > This is the nature of misogyny. The invalid logical implication that gender controls behavior. Why do you consider the very suggestion misogynistic (leaving aside whether it's true)? "Misogyny" means "hatred of women," in the literal sense. What you're stating is that biological essentialism implies misogyny, which isn't true. As a counterexample, there are radical feminists and self-described misandrists who argue that men and women act differently for inherent biological reasons, and they aren't misogynist.