2 ms·
> Is your role to sniff this sort of thing out, a whole company, or part of your job on a team? Internal [cyber]investigations. We branched off from cybersecur
by jstarfish 3y ago
> Is your role to sniff this sort of thing out, a whole company, or part of your job on a team?
Internal [cyber]investigations. We branched off from cybersecurity, but there's a sister team that handles traditional cases (anything not involving digital forensics).
> We have MDE, which I am starting to dig into now.
If you're talking about Defender for Endpoints, that might be the same thing (I can't keep up with Microsoft's product shuffling). There should be a dashboard you/the admin can access at security.microsoft.com, with a cylinder database icon (Advanced Hunting) in the top left corner that lets you run KQL queries like the ones I shared.
> For the devs, a simple glance at their gitlab contributions tells you a lot. For remote folks the VPN is another like the logins. The truly lazy won't even bother to be on the VPN, but doesn't mean they are not working. Apparently one of our main sys admins is never on the VPN.
Again, kudos for your restraint. Divining truth from ambiguity is not easy.
Commit counts can be an inverse metric. Bad devs overinflate their commits ("typo correction lol"), and those diligently trying to iron out bugs and working on genuinely-hard problems will have less code to commit.
My own VPN usage is spotty, and I'm remote. I just don't always need to be on it-- I spend a ton of time looking at spreadsheets and logs locally. Email, Slack and OneDrive work when I'm not on the corporate network, so sometimes I don't even notice I'm not connected.
Your sysadmin...be careful there. I'm literally seeing the same thing wrt low/no logins of one of ours, but any number of witnesses could confirm he's actively working (attends meetings, available when needed, tasks are completed, etc.). It's just not clear to me how he's doing the job. The nature of that role also makes them a dangerous person to piss off.
No one data point means more than any other. It's all a game of how many red flags, in aggregate, does the individual raise?
> I don't think we have gone up against a real professional yet. If they are here, they are really good.
The single biggest facepalm of my career occurred when I live-demoed this concept to the rest of the team and outed one of our own.
I assumed it was a glitch, but others were harboring suspicions they couldn't justify raising until I presented numbers suggesting that the individual wasn't even logging into their computer. Still wasn't enough to take direct action on...but they did not survive the next round of layoffs.