4 ms·
Wikipedia has information about this. Essentially the topic of the age, as put forth by the author of this article, is considered "fringe". Doesn't mean this is
by gaoshan 3y ago
Wikipedia has information about this. Essentially the topic of the age, as put forth by the author of this article, is considered "fringe". Doesn't mean this is outright untrue but it seems that, aside from the authors of this piece, the age of Gunung Padang is very much not a settled matter and the information contained in the above link is the fringe theory that is in doubt.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunung_Padang https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunung_Padang
- wuliwong 3y agoIt looks like this wikipedia article has not been updated since the publication of their work. The wikipedia article mentions the work is unpublished multiple times. Potentially, it has changed the view on this dating.
- waihtis 3y agoIts funny how people take Wikipedia at face value. Happened in a local newspaper the other day, it said something slightly wonky and referenced a Wikipedia article as the source, which in turn referenced a wonky Youtube video as it's source for that info.
- edgyquant 3y agoIt’s not funny, it’s scary as hell.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]