His statistics are double bad because he confused correlation and causality. He just assumes that people are motivated by their bosses and good bosses equals go

His statistics are double bad because he confused correlation and causality. He just assumes that people are motivated by their bosses and good bosses equals good motivation. I find that assumption extremely suspect. My suspicion is most of the time it works the other way around, people are motivated by a large variety of issues and their current passion for their job colors their opinions of everyone working there.