3 ms·
I imagine NYPD's response to this will be to set up every precinct so there is a guard station at the front and you have to give a reason to be let in "for secu
by KennyBlanken 3y ago
I imagine NYPD's response to this will be to set up every precinct so there is a guard station at the front and you have to give a reason to be let in "for security."
- DoesntMatter22 3y agoThat is already common and they go in and film anyway. If the public can legally get there they can legally film
- LegitShady 3y agoi imagine that policy too would be subject to legal challenge, and if placed immediately after this judgement would probably not draw a lot of sympathy from a judge. The issue is that filming in the public foyer/area of a public building IS legitimate business, even protected activity, so the more they do to make that difficult the worse it becomes for them.
- anonymouskimmer 3y agoFrom the article they have this angle covered too, though I don't know whether the judge specifically ruled on it as well: > and the NYPD instituted its policy without following the Citywide Administrative Procedure Act, which specifies the steps a City agency must take before it can put a new rule in place.
- tehwebguy 3y agoTheir response will just be to ignore the order, they don’t care what judges say. NYPD has been revolting against any oversight for years.