2 ms·
It's the same bullshit argument used by Spotify and Klarna. If the companies are already providing better terms then there's even less reason to not sign a coll
by piva00 3y ago
It's the same bullshit argument used by Spotify and Klarna. If the companies are already providing better terms then there's even less reason to not sign a collective bargaining agreement: the CBA only sets the lower bar, anything over that the companies are free to provide as they do right now. Nothing changes if that's the argument.
What they are trying to hide is the argument that a CBA will give power to employees during major reorgs with layoffs, a CBA doesn't set an upper bound to what employers can offer as benefits, just a lower one.
- kriops 3y agoScandinavian unions are incredibly naive financially speaking, and entirely lack a basic understanding of capital markets on an organizational level - including their relationship with the question of what constitutes fair compensation. They also completely neglect the stakeholder problem when considering compensation models - where arguments such as yours about raising the floor are completely removed from the context of financial realities.