3 ms·
It's a transparent BS argument. If Tesla provides better terms then what harm would come from signing an agreement to not provide worse terms than the industry
by bjourne 3y ago
It's a transparent BS argument. If Tesla provides better terms then what harm would come from signing an agreement to not provide worse terms than the industry baseline?
- toolz 3y agoI don't know anything about this situation, but to play devils advocate here, if my goals were not in alignment with the union bosses or whatever group is trying to get me to sign. I would avoid even reading the terms if there wasn't real market pressure to do so. If a group exists explicitly trying to be an authority over how I behave but we have nonaligned goals, I'm never going to make it painless for them to have input on how I behave. I would want them to know I will operate as I deem correct until I have goals that can't be met without their approval. They could be trying to force me to sign a contract that simply says I'll operate however I want to and if I believed they were an opposing force and not a partner I wouldn't sign it until I was force to sign it.
- vincnetas 3y agoThey might have to experience Scandinavian market pressure. One story about how McDonalds choose to experience it : Once the sympathy strikes got going, McDonalds folded pretty quickly and decided to start following the hotel and restaurant agreement in 1989. This is why McDonalds workers in Denmark are paid $22 per hour. https://mattbruenig.com/2021/09/20/when-mcdonalds-came-to-denmark/ https://mattbruenig.com/2021/09/20/when-mcdonalds-came-to-de...