>You say you can use type-safe urls, but you aren't actually doing it I'm not because I don't want them. If I did I would be using blaze-html and web-routes.

>You say you can use type-safe urls, but you aren't actually doing it I'm not because I don't want them. If I did I would be using blaze-html and web-routes. >But Again, this is just one example. I politely and genuinely asked that you provide those other examples, as the one you did provide is obviously bogus. >But you chose to give us zero feedback until we make a 1.0 release announcement Actually, I did ask in IRC about a year ago. And two days after I asked you offered up the same response you have been giving here: "hamlet is perfect and you are wrong for not liking it". I also got similarly slow and unhelpful responses with other issues, like how yesod used to only work on ipv6. >and then come out of the wood-work and pic at every nit you can find in the comments of the release announcement and state some other framework is better If you were a little less defensive and a little more reasonable, you might see that I never said anything of the sort.