> The final text of the eIDAS regulation counters this with a right to pseudonymity[: i]t allows users to use a pseudonym generated by the Wallet and that is on

> The final text of the eIDAS regulation counters this with a right to pseudonymity[: i]t allows users to use a pseudonym generated by the Wallet and that is only stored locally In which scenarios could it happen that for pseudonymity, for the purpose of anonymity, one should resort to a pseudo-identity generated by the certificate for the actual identity?