> The NFL's revenue is not really a reflection on our priorities. Isn't it reasonable to assume that, if costumers had different priorities and seek for scienc

> The NFL's revenue is not really a reflection on our priorities. Isn't it reasonable to assume that, if costumers had different priorities and seek for science research news more often. Then advertisers would, maybe, consider investing in science research instead of football? If we could, somehow, teach and get people interested in science. Then having your brand name associated with the cure of cancer could be more valuable than having your brand associated with football. It just seems to me that it's a matter of whose priorities are we talking about. You're not wrong, but I have the impression you and noonespecial are talking about different things.