4 ms·
Google Bard introduces "Human reviewers," sparking privacy concerns
- Tommstein 3y agoHasn't Bard told you that your conversations may be reviewed and to not enter sensitive information since the dawn of Bard?
- infotainment 3y agoI believe so, and also that ChatGPT has similar terms of use. (Though in ChatGPT's case, they specifically note if you run it in "history off" mode there won't be any review.)
- ororroro 3y agoBard has "history off" too. "If you turn off Bard Activity, future conversations won’t be sent for human review or used to improve our generative machine-learning models."
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- wilg 3y agoIt's journalistic malpractice to say "sparking privacy concerns" when it is in fact just the author's opinion. There is no one cited as being concerned. Just that the author thinks the "move" is "likely to spark privacy concerns".
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- swatcoder 3y agoYou'll note that there's also no interviewing, no requested comments, and no research besides summarizing widely publicized information from one corporate web page. Holding it to any standard of journalism is a stretch. Nobody calls it out anymore, but this is a blog post.
- Vaslo 3y agoThis is pretty common in media, much more noticeable in a lot of political contexts where the author cites something like “concern from the public” when we really it’s just the author and her pals.
- kornhole 3y agoI am far more concerned about AI ingesting data about myself and others than I am about humans reading it. Humans have limited attention, memory, organizational ability, interest and processing power. Supercomputers with AI remember everything and can find patterns to exploit that no human ever could.
- asimpleusecase 3y agoNothing to see here, move on , move on.