3 ms·
I love CoffeeScript, and we're considering moving the Zepto tests to use it. (We're also using Ruby for our build system, for example, because we like it, and t
by madrobby 15y ago
I love CoffeeScript, and we're considering moving the Zepto tests to use it. (We're also using Ruby for our build system, for example, because we like it, and think it's the right tool for the job.)
I think for the library code itself we prefer using JavaScript because in lots of ways it allows very fine-tuned control, one (of many) examples for this is deliberately using == instead of ===.
- jashkenas 15y agoInteresting. Taking a brief peek through the source, I don't see any "==" comparisons that look like they couldn't just as well be done with "===" -- except for a handful of "== undefined". And of course, that particular check would be done in CoffeeScript with the existential operator. But I'll take your word for it.