3 ms·
Yea I mean you don’t even have to go this far but it’s obvious it can do logical, mathematical and systematic reasoning. I have no idea why people keep insistin
by tsunamifury 3y ago
Yea I mean you don’t even have to go this far but it’s obvious it can do logical, mathematical and systematic reasoning. I have no idea why people keep insisting it can’t.
- vidarh 3y agoYeah, I asked it that partly because I got curious if it could handle a task that well (because I know plenty of people who can't...), and partly because so many people keep rejecting other reasoning tasks.
- jjtheblunt 3y agoPeople keep asking because they are looking for a rigorous example in a citation that's unambiguous. If it's not obvious, that is even more compelling. I personally think the more theory trained folks wonder if there will turn out to be some analogy with the corresponding towers of languages and machines recognizing them (regular languages, finite automata, push down automata, turing machines, for examples). https://a.co/d/8ix6V6m https://a.co/d/8ix6V6m is an example covering the historical language classes and recognizers for them. Perhaps LLMs and various architectures will turn out fitting what you describe.