3 ms·
Even the people who work in the most dangerous subsector of this line of work barely die violently, is the point of the memorial wall. You've listed a whole bu
by pvg 3y ago
Even the people who work in the most dangerous subsector of this line of work barely die violently, is the point of the memorial wall.
You've listed a whole bunch of questions but the things you've proposed - the threat, its reality, the notion it actually affects someone, etc are entirely of your own making. The onus is on you to provide any evidence of them and there just doesn't seem to be any.
I'm saying it's for sure an attack vector. How could it not be?
Empirically, it doesn't appear to be and hasn't been ever? Again, what makes you think otherwise?
- wutwutwat 3y ago> when you have access to privileged information that others are willing to kill, in extreme cases, to obtain The key phrase in my original statement is _in extreme cases_ - I'm not saying such a thing is common or even likely, I'm saying when you have a bunch of tech contractors with TS access all over the place advertising to the world that they have such access, there's no way other places haven't used that info in an attempt to intimidate someone, bribe, or force, one of those contractors into helping them get into a system or get information out. If a contractor was able to yank and leak the Prism documents with the same access, working for the same firm as some of the people in the group I linked to, then it's a massive risk that these people are being looked into and attempts are being made to flip them somehow. Might not be by killing people, but who's to say for sure.