> Producing OSS is not the only way to contribute to the OSS ecosystem Yes, it is. Otherwise, your contribution is not part of the OSS ecosystem. > github off

> Producing OSS is not the only way to contribute to the OSS ecosystem Yes, it is. Otherwise, your contribution is not part of the OSS ecosystem. > github offers free services for OSS developers who otherwise would have to host them themselves Github offer free services to anyone, OSS or not. > that's the reason why they got so popular and i think we can all agree on the fact that it's incredibly useful I think we can all agree it's called a "loss leader". It's not useful whatsoever to those who refuse to further enrich a for-profit company producing proprietary software which considers your own assets to be their proprietary data (see also: Copilot). In fact it makes things more difficult for us because we're locked out of contributing to virtually any OSS project.