4 ms·
People will still link other Nature articles as if they mean anything. Gell-Mann Amnesia.
by renewiltord 3y ago
People will still link other Nature articles as if they mean anything. Gell-Mann Amnesia.
- smt88 3y agoSo any source that's ever been wrong is not credible? What infallible sources or publications are you relying on?
- Garrrrrr 3y agoFox News
- smt88 3y agoFox News has never published a retraction?
- johnnyanmac 3y agoI think the more productive question is to ask: how many times can you cry wolf before you lose a grade of credibility?
- serf 3y agowhen a group stops large disclosed retractions and starts publishing the retraction somewhere in the Sports Section -- or worse yet : when the retractions stop.
- renewiltord 3y agoWell, if you uncritically share Nature articles, you're a sucker. It doesn't matter too much to me. Poor choices by others helps me make money.
- smt88 3y agoHow does the choice to share Nature articles make you money?
- renewiltord 3y agoPolymarket.
- permo-w 3y agomuch like Das Kapital, Gell-Mann Amnesia is sound in its observations, but poor in its conclusions