3 ms·

The real question is why Nature keeps publishing this guy without any scrutiny. They really should have learned their lesson after the fiasco that was their las

• geophile 3y ago
  … and why he keeps getting past reviewers, who must know his reputation.
  • bhelkey 3y ago
    In an ideal world, the peer reviewers wouldn't know the author of the paper, right?
    • mjoin 3y ago
      they really know when reading the paper. small world, everyone PI knows who is working on what
    • jessriedel 3y ago
      The vast majority of academic journal review is single-blind (reviewers are anonymous, but not authors). Double-blind review can be requested by authors submitting to Nature Journals, but it's rare. https://www.science.org/content/article/few-authors-choose-anonymous-peer-review-massive-study-nature-journals-shows https://www.science.org/content/article/few-authors-choose-a...