4 ms·
At a glance the type system is quite barebones and nominative. I'd like to see Gleam add support for structural types and maybe set theoretic [1] [1] https://
by lkjaldfwltjohw 3y ago
At a glance the type system is quite barebones and nominative.
I'd like to see Gleam add support for structural types and maybe set theoretic [1]
[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.12783 https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.12783
- m8s 3y agoFor what purpose? Is Gleam today unable to do things you’d like to be able to do?