> And partly, we as a society have to make some tradeoffs. We want something from 12 CFR § 21.11(k)(1) . It was not written by accident or because the drafters

> And partly, we as a society have to make some tradeoffs. We want something from 12 CFR § 21.11(k)(1) . It was not written by accident or because the drafters were stupid. Every future with 12 CFR § 21.11(k)(1) in it will include many Americans whose bank accounts are closed for no reason that can be disclosed to them. Many of them will have done nothing wrong. I totally dispute that and there's a contradiction in there. If many of them will have done nothing wrong, then the drafters were plain stupid. Typically senile, dumb, stupid, out-of-touch people. There's nothing for the people in there and it wasn't the result of a democratic process. It is also a complete and utter failure, costing $180bn worldwide for a mere $12bn frozen (not even seized but temporarily frozen, some being actually legit money that'll eventually be unfrozen). In other words: it's yet another pointless law that is not having the intended effect and that is costing business and taxpayers money and time while making people feel they live in a dystopian madness. And there's more drugs than ever sold both in, say, the EU and the US. And there's still child pornography. And there's still 3% to 5% of the world's GDP that is tied to criminal activities. "The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the state" (Tacitus thousands of years ago)