Cute and whimsical, but I was thinking along the lines of context for answering "why?" "..because it was defined at [....] and used [....] and [...] as a int32

Cute and whimsical, but I was thinking along the lines of context for answering "why?" "..because it was defined at [....] and used [....] and [...] as a int32 type (thus coerced to int64), but passed in [...] as a"