> The odds of notch finding this standard favorable to my standards are about the same as him favoring my standards. Huh? Notch doesn't have to give a shit abo

> The odds of notch finding this standard favorable to my standards are about the same as him favoring my standards. Huh? Notch doesn't have to give a shit about these standard. He's writing the emulator (and memory-mapped I/O); we still need conventions on top (calling external libraries; linking libraries and so on). > the standards are going to be what the implementors find convenient. Yes, of course. All I'm saying is that instead of each assembler/compiler/linker using its own "most convenient convention" we can at least try to unify them. And someone needs to write down drafts.