3 ms·
A user in another thread aptly described it as Twitter with pictures. I don't use Instagram and don't really see a reason to, but that doesn't mean others feel
by kmfrk 15y ago
A user in another thread aptly described it as Twitter with pictures. I don't use Instagram and don't really see a reason to, but that doesn't mean others feel the same way.
Roughly speaking, you might say:
Facebook: Social with everyone (polysocial?)
Path: Social with close friends (oligosocial?)
Pair: Social with your S.O. (monosocial?)
Twitter: Microsocial in text with everyone
Instagram: Microsocial in pictures (nanosocial? :P)
Having said that, I actually had a recent discussion with someone about how the heck they were going to monetize the service, and we didn't reeeally come up with a good suggestion aside from the expectable ads and premium filters.
Instagram: Microsocial with everyone
- ElliotH 15y agoFor those people who were clueless as me about Path and Pair and found them hard to Google: Path - https://path.com/ https://path.com/ Pair - http://trypair.com/ http://trypair.com/
- wmboy 15y agoPair is actually quite a cool idea, never heard of it before now. Couples like to hang out with other couples, so there might be revenue potential in the idea as well...