3 ms·
No. I mean the paper mentioned in the Twitter thread you didn't read. Here is the link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.18233 https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.18233
by cubefox 3y ago
No. I mean the paper mentioned in the Twitter thread you didn't read. Here is the link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.18233 https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.18233
- MeImCounting 3y agoSo yes the paper that was already discredited in the essay I posted that you didn't read ------------------ "While I was writing this, an extra paper game out on the same topic as the "Dual-use biotechnology" paper, with the fun title "Will releasing the weights of future large language models grant widespread access to pandemic agents?"." Maybe this is a totally different paper with exactly the same name but if not, I am not really interested in reading a paper that is unrepeatable and doesn't use control groups because that isnt science