4 ms·
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakespeare_authorship_question#Case_against_Shakespeare's_authorship https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakespeare_authorship_qu
by Smoosh 3y ago
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakespeare_authorship_question#Case_against_Shakespeare's_authorship https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakespeare_authorship_questio...
- bazoom42 3y agoThere is nothing mysterious about any of that. It is just a list of arguments used by the conspiracy theorists, and they are all easily debunked. Just take the argument that because Shakespeares mother possibly was illiteral (which we don’t know, but it is plausible) he couldn’t have written about women sending letters. So a guy could write about ancient Rome, Cleopatra , ghosts, and faeries, but couldnt possibly have written about women sending letters if it didnt happen in his childhood home? This is so stupid I’m at a loss for words. Or how could he use the word “tennis balls” in Henry V when his childhood home didnt have a tennis court? So mysterious!