41 ms·
It may or may not be "awful". It's probably much better than humans trying a similar math without math approach. But it's a clearly suboptimal approach. Humans
by spywaregorilla 3y ago
It may or may not be "awful". It's probably much better than humans trying a similar math without math approach.
But it's a clearly suboptimal approach. Humans and AI alike can do well with bad approaches if they must. But we can find alternative ways and we need not shoehorn AI into being LLMs.
- vidarh 3y agoWe can given them tools, just like we use tools. And I'm sure we can also find ways of "wiring" tools more directly into the models. I'm not convinced it's better than humans in general at a "math without math approach" yet, but it's certainly better than a lot of people at it. They also do make really trivial mistakes sometimes. But I also don't think there is any indication that any of this is down to things that can't easily be trained out of it. I