4 ms·
That could easily violate the rule of law though. Knowingly trading stolen property is often times a crime. If we know the land was stolen by the tribe we are g
by ImJamal 3y ago
That could easily violate the rule of law though. Knowingly trading stolen property is often times a crime. If we know the land was stolen by the tribe we are giving it to we aren't really following the rule of law.
- s1artibartfast 3y agoIn that hypothetical, Why are we changing the mind about if it is stolen or not? We didn't consider it stolen when we first made the agreement.
- yawpitch 3y agoConsidering the "we" in this case only have possession of the (allegedly and / or only hypothetically stolen) property because "we" engaged in genocide, it's kind of rich for "us" to worry about violating the rule of law.