Everyone can see that I'm very clearly offering an opinion, and it's basically in agreement with your overall point. In your blind rush to defend China you've m

Everyone can see that I'm very clearly offering an opinion, and it's basically in agreement with your overall point. In your blind rush to defend China you've missed the mark. But anyway, after an exhaustive search I've concluded that there's no active research being done into determining if a statement is worth of being labeled as "sus". In that case all we can do is defer to our machine god, ChatGPT. > Yes, making a sweeping and unsupported claim that every business in a country of over 1.4 billion people has "cooked books" without any evidence would be considered suspicious and unfair.