2 ms·

But that's really clear on the body cam. The criminal punches the camera, the camera recording ends, and then the criminal claims that the police did something

But that's really clear on the body cam. The criminal punches the camera, the camera recording ends, and then the criminal claims that the police did something to him? That's going to be harder to sell in court. In fact, that would probably lead to adverse inference against the criminal, not against the officer, because it's the criminal who made it so that there was no evidence.

josephcsible 3y ago
> that would probably lead to adverse inference against the criminal, not against the officer, because it's the criminal who made it so that there was no evidence. That's how things should work, but wouldn't the idea in question mean that, just as with other zero-tolerance rules, common sense like that wouldn't be allowed anymore?