4 ms·
> Block lattice is IMO far too unwieldy to use ... It involves scanning a QR code and clicking confirm. It's faster and easier than using a credit card, and us
by mandmandam 3y ago
> Block lattice is IMO far too unwieldy to use
... It involves scanning a QR code and clicking confirm. It's faster and easier than using a credit card, and uses a tenth of the energy.
> is useless for decentralization unless the system you're making payments on is actually yours
No idea where you got that idea, but it's very silly. You've missed the first principles of cyrpto payments somehow.
> still nothing solves the oracle problem
And cash does? Did Nano claim to solve it? Did I?
>you're still kicking the centralization can down the road
I don't think you understand what 'decentralization' means in the context of crypto. I'm a little curious why you feel qualified to talk authoritatively about this topic?
- yunwal 3y ago> It involves scanning a QR code and clicking confirm > No idea where you got that idea… Block lattice relies on private ledgers owned by the 2 parties of a transaction. It then consolidates those ledgers which is how it saves energy. If you’re giving someone else access to change that ledger, it’s no more decentralized than cash. > And cash does? Cash doesn’t, but it also doesn’t claim to provide decentralization or enforce contracts without state involvement. The entire purpose of crypto is to remove state involvement from contracts, which it fails to do.