Thanks. Addressing these issues: > You can clearly see images even through a mesh. > You don't need 100% of the light to reach you to have a clear image of so

Thanks. Addressing these issues: > You can clearly see images even through a mesh. > You don't need 100% of the light to reach you to have a clear image of something. Even a small portion of the light is enough to get a clear image. You can see something that's relatively large (in your field of vision) through a mesh. Something that's a tiny point seems like another matter. Even if you can't see something directly, you could see emitted light indirectly, that reflects off something else. But that doesn't get you a direct image of it, like the ones the astronomy teams publish.