3 ms·
Assuming that there is no way to be 100% certain that all food is safe all the time, what do you think is the acceptable amount of poisoning that should be cons
by psychlops 3y ago
Assuming that there is no way to be 100% certain that all food is safe all the time, what do you think is the acceptable amount of poisoning that should be considered safe? 0.001%? Six sigma? There will always be some sort of food contamination going on if people want to buy food.
Is this example outside a normal range in the larger picture? Or is it just an outrage article? Corporations are constantly cost-cutting to keep product prices low for consumers, so that can't really be a way to judge liability.
- dubcanada 3y agoI am not concerned with 100%s that is impossible, what I am concerned with is negligence within the industry. That's why it would be up to a review, if found guilty then applicable recourse is delt. I can't say what is right/wrong. And maybe nothing could have prevented this, but that doesn't mean it should just be a flyer on grocery stores. There needs to be reasonings and data collected to prevent it from happening again and prevent companies that don't care about you or me from running over us.