If you create a painting someone else reproduces instantly with ease then it would imply the quality was not high enough to command the price. If incentive fall

If you create a painting someone else reproduces instantly with ease then it would imply the quality was not high enough to command the price. If incentive falls then supply would fall and either find a new equilibrium price or demand would remain and prices would rise. Seems more like quality would matter. Hard copies would matter; perhaps the disc you issue your media on is rated to last 100 years, whereas someone's digital copy can be deleted with a keystroke. Copyright is bullshit in a market of perfect reproducibility.