Seems like a good table-setting measure. Judge is saying "what you claimed isn't how it works; if you want to amend your claim to say how it actually works (and

Seems like a good table-setting measure. Judge is saying "what you claimed isn't how it works; if you want to amend your claim to say how it actually works (and why that's infringing), you can do that now." Judge is also letting the 'unauthorized use' charges move ahead. To me, this feels like the right way to make sure the questions at the heart of the trial are satisfied by the results of the trial. SOP, for sure, but it definitely could have gone the other way, with the judge just throwing it out altogether, so I'm glad this is moving in this direction, instead.