3 ms·

Why is forcibly sterilizing animals better than forcibly sterilizing humans, in such a view? Or in their own framework, did Bhutan just engage in genocide agai

• dncornholio 3y ago
  If we believe that animals were created by someone for men, it would follow that men were also created for animals since some animals do eat human flesh.
  • shiroiuma 3y ago
    The problem I see here is that dogs are not just "animals". They're artificial creations of humans, and an invasive species when they're not kept as pets inside homes. There's a good reason that, for instance, in the Australian outback they kill, on sight, and feral cat they find: they're invasive species that predate the local native animal species to extinction. Animals do not have a right to live when they don't belong in a particular ecosystem, especially when those animals aren't even natural to begin with. If we were talking about a native species of bear, things would be entirely different.