His claims have been supported with hard evidence. But it’s hard evidence that people don’t like, so they ignore it or throw “-ism” exceptions [1] at it and pre

His claims have been supported with hard evidence. But it’s hard evidence that people don’t like, so they ignore it or throw “-ism” exceptions [1] at it and pretend that precludes them from critically thought. [2]. You can see how an example of how much the media loves apply that “misinformation” word you keep using to people who refer to officially peer reviewed government sponsored research that doesn’t align with the narrative they want to push here [2]. I expect that level of bias from the media, encyclopedias should be tasked to rise above it. The report to which he refers is here [3], published by the NIH. And spoke. about here [4] 1. http://paulgraham.com/heresy.html http://paulgraham.com/heresy.html 2. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/rfk-jr-accused-making-antisemitic-racist-claims-covid/story?id=101323851 https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/rfk-jr-accused-making-antise... 3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32664879/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32664879/ 4. https://twitter.com/RobertKennedyJr/status/1680227322509635595 https://twitter.com/RobertKennedyJr/status/16802273225096355...