This article is extremely disingenuous about MacKay's "arguments against" section. In reality, he was pointing out the objections that might be raised against r

This article is extremely disingenuous about MacKay's "arguments against" section. In reality, he was pointing out the objections that might be raised against renewable projects, in a tongue-in-cheek manner. His graphic where >95% of potential renewables are crossed out because of various ridiculous NIMBY arguments is meant to make a point about the practical problems of delivering large projects. It's not a serious prediction... for that, you need to look later in the book, at the sections the author conveniently ignored.