4 ms·
Neal Stephenson's Anathem (2008) has a great throwaway section on this: > “Early in the Reticulum-thousands of years ago-it became almost useless because it wa
by drakenot 3y ago
Neal Stephenson's Anathem (2008) has a great throwaway section on this:
> “Early in the Reticulum-thousands of years ago-it became almost useless because it was cluttered with faulty, obsolete, or downright misleading information,” Sammann said.
> “Crap, you once called it,” I reminded him.
> “Yes-a technical term. So crap filtering became important. Businesses were built around it. Some of those businesses came up with a clever plan to make more money: they poisoned the well. They began to put crap on the Reticulum deliberately, forcing people to use their products to filter that crap back out. They created syndevs whose sole purpose was to spew crap into the Reticulum. But it had to be good crap.”
> “What is good crap?” Arsibalt asked in a politely incredulous tone.
> “Well, bad crap would be an unformatted document consisting of random letters. Good crap would be a beautifully typeset, well-written document that contained a hundred correct, verifiable sentences and one that was subtly false. It’s a lot harder to generate good crap. At first they had to hire humans to churn it out. They mostly did it by taking legitimate documents and inserting errors-swapping one name for another, say. But it didn’t really take off until the military got interested.”
> “As a tactic for planting misinformation in the enemy’s reticules, you mean,” Osa said. “This I know about. You are referring to the Artificial Inanity programs of the mid-First Millennium A.R.”
> “Exactly!” Sammann said. “Artificial Inanity systems of enormous sophistication and power were built for exactly the purpose Fraa Osa has mentioned. In no time at all, the praxis leaked to the commercial sector and spread to the Rampant Orphan Botnet Ecologies. Never mind. The point is that there was a sort of Dark Age on the Reticulum that lasted until my Ita forerunners were able to bring matters in hand.”
- f1shy 3y agoThis is a gem! Thank you for sharing.
- nonrandomstring 3y ago> Ita forerunners Haven't read Anathem and couldn't find in any summary who the Ita are. Stephenson's story being about a post-societal collapse I fantasise that that ITA are the Information Truth Authority. Well, if Stephenson didn't mean that, I'll just make it up, right? :) Because anyway, that's the thing we need to be mindful of and avoid in the coming years. In some ways I see LLM-AI and DeepFakes as being the undoing of the printing press and the camera respectively. Both inventions "liberated truth". Gutenberg's press eroded the authority of the church and kick-started the real scientific revolution. The camera changed popular conceptions of geography and history. Together they created "News" as a concept in modernity, even before electronics brought instantaneous television. If AI undoes this, a good way to understand the worst future is to rewind to a pre-Gutenberg and pre-photographic era. A key dystopian feature would be a singular centralised truth and information authority, essentially replacing the church circa 14th century.
- Cosi1125 3y ago> Haven't read Anathem and couldn't find in any summary who the Ita are. IT Administrators :-)
- nonrandomstring 3y agoNow that makes perfect sense! :)