4 ms·
Part of the issue is that people do not see the same problem, even thought the same phenomena is being observed. Probably the first step is for everyone to agre
by proc0 3y ago
Part of the issue is that people do not see the same problem, even thought the same phenomena is being observed. Probably the first step is for everyone to agree on what the problem is to begin with. In places like SF, the problem is the system, which creates homelessness. In other conservative cities, the problem is people breaking the law (in other words, personal accountability).
Just like any hypothesis it can be tested, and we can see results. For more than a decade now the system hypothesis has been tested in SF and anyone that can honestly reflect on the problem can see that the hypothesis has failed. The more SF has done to fix the problem, the larger the problem has become. I can even predict this will not be solved and the problem will just keep getting worse. It will not change until the leadership of the city admits they got it wrong and they need to reframe the entire situation.
- huytersd 3y agoNo, it’s the compassionate policies that shitheads from all over the country migrate to.
- strangesmells06 3y agoI disagree. The problem is not the system. The system helps many people. This part gets ignored by you and many others. The problem is this shit heads who take advantage of the system. It's really the problem with any system created for and by human beings. That's what needs to be focused on... get rid of the shit heads not the system overall. being fanatic about throwing the baby out with the bath water is not it in my opinion.
- proc0 3y agoI'm saying SF tried the system hypothesis and is failing. Also not just SF but most large cities. So yes, they need to factor in the human component which is incentives and intentions.