3 ms·
Could you please use arguments, rather than fallacies? I already said that I primarily have experience with Snap. But I did research both Snap and Yesod before
by danieldk 15y ago
Could you please use arguments, rather than fallacies? I already said that I primarily have experience with Snap. But I did research both Snap and Yesod before using Snap.
Or from the horse's mouth:
Snap: "Snap is a simple web development framework for unix systems, written in the Haskell programming language."
Source: http://snapframework.com/ http://snapframework.com/
The Yesod book: "The Haskell community is constantly pushing the boundaries finding the cleanest, most efficient solutions for each challenge.
The downside of such a powerful ecosystem is the complexity of choice. By using Yesod, you will already have most of the tools chosen for you, and you can be guaranteed they work together."
Source: http://www.yesodweb.com/ http://www.yesodweb.com/
- gregwebs 15y agoI am very surprised that you think you can make accurate comparisons through googling! But perhaps this points to a documentation problem with Yesod. I am probably being entirely too harsh here. It is just that when you call something "elaborate" that is not an objective statement taken from the docs. You were probably trying to phrase things in an objective way, but I think every developer views "elaborate" as having a very bad connotation. I also disagree with the Sinatra vs. Rails comparison for various reasons, but I don't want to spend time arguing analogies.