> regarded by members of the profession as disgraceful, dishonourable and/or unprofessional. So it's not what he said it's how he said it? I think most people

> regarded by members of the profession as disgraceful, dishonourable and/or unprofessional. So it's not what he said it's how he said it? I think most people from democratic societies would see repressing speech based on such nebulous standards as worse. You could target anyone this way for any slip of the tongue. This is a watch what you say society and I think you should be careful, you sound a bit heated and unprofessional maybe a regulatory agency might come knocking at your door. I think also it's largely only Canadians who view it as defensible and Canada is increasingly being seen as a nation that does not respect speech rights by people on both the left and the right. Go in the street and talk to 5 random people. Very few people left or right view Canada's government as exercising legitimate and responsible power. I think Maintaing the illusion seems to be a thing for a members of the older generation who spend all their time watching the CBC.