8 ms·

TIOBE : C overtakes Java as the No.1 programming language

94 points by sonic0002 15y ago

apl 15y ago
So Scala ranks behind the Lego Mindstorms language and Visual FoxPro in terms of community popularity? Sure thing. I know that valid results don't always conform to expectations, anecdotal evidence and intuition; there's a believability limit, though, which is being crossed here. TIOBE may be measuring its thing correctly, but in that case it's measuring the wrong thing.
- nknight 15y ago
  It would strongly violate my expectations for Scala to be more popular than LabVIEW (which is NOT just "the Lego Mindstorms language") or Visual FoxPro. The "community" they're measuring is not the HN community, which is not even close to a representative sample of engineers worldwide.
  - apl 15y ago
    > It would strongly violate my expectations for Scala to be > more popular than LabVIEW (which is NOT just "the Lego > Mindstorms language") I'm not talking about LabView; it's literally the Lego Mindstorms language [1] that outranks Erlang, MATLAB, ActionScript, Scheme, Groovy, R, Scala, and so Forth. LabView appears in the "Can't compare that meaningfully" category. So consider your expectations violated. > The "community" they're measuring is not the HN > community, which is not even close to a representative > sample of engineers worldwide. I understand the potential bubble effects at work. I'm not arguing that Scala or Clojure or whatever's hip should come out on top. What I'm contesting is their notion of popularity. The measurements may be reliable (I don't think they are), but they're sure as hell not measuring anything worthwhile. NXT-G may be more "popular" in the sense of being Googled more often, but that's utterly irrelevant for 99% of all cases where you'd be interested in language popularity. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lego_Mindstorms_NXT#NXT-G http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lego_Mindstorms_NXT#NXT-G
    - wvenable 15y ago
      > it's literally the Lego Mindstorms language [1] that outranks Erlang, MATLAB, ActionScript, Scheme, Groovy, R, Scala, and so Forth. I'm not sure why you're so surprised. I can see that it's quite likely that Lego Mindstorms is more popular and has more users than many of those languages. I don't yet have a Mindstorms set, but I've been considering it for a while -- I can't say the same for Clojure, Groovy, Scheme, or R.
    - vorg 15y ago
      Tiobe can easily be gamed. Look at OReilly's book sales to see a truer ranking of language popularity at http://radar.oreilly.com/2012/04/computer-book-market-2011-part4.html http://radar.oreilly.com/2012/04/computer-book-market-2011-p... The treemap is especially interesting. The square size shows market size, while the background color shows percentage change from previous year. E.g. both Scala and Clojure have green "increasing share" squares, while nearby Groovy and Labview have smaller, red "decreasing share" squares. Because people need to pay OReilly for the book, it's much more difficult to cheat than Tiobe, which only takes some "Project Manager" to spend half their day creating websites, generating cycles of links, producing online verbiage, submitting pages to search engines, blah blah blah
- bad_user 15y ago
  The TIOBE index is measuring the hits these languages get on Google, Blogger, Wikipedia, YouTube and other search engines. See: http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/tpci_definition.htm http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/tpci_d... It's easy to see how this measures the wrong thing. A better metric for me is the popularity of languages in open-source software, which could be measured by (say) the number of popular/active projects. For instance take a look at: https://github.com/languages https://github.com/languages ... but this also has flaws, because GitHub is favored in the Javascript/Ruby communities and open-source C#/.NET projects end up mostly on CodePlex, a lot of Java projects are hosted by Apache, a lot of Python projects are on BitBucket and so on. So a better metric would be to aggregate the projects from all popular project hosting services and count them, with some kind of weight attached. So for instance it would be unfair to count the lines of code in the Linux kernel, but it would also be unfair for the Linux kernel to have the same weight as some random project on GitHub that's being watched by 5 people. I would make this weight proportional to the number of active contributers, such that when a project is left unmaintained its weight will eventually drop to zero.
  - MattJ100 15y ago
    Take a look at http://www.ohloh.net/languages http://www.ohloh.net/languages - you can sort by lines or commits.
  - lkrubner 15y ago
    >So a better metric would be to aggregate the projects from > all popular project hosting services and count them, with > some kind of weight attached. Great idea. Do you think you might run with this idea? I like it as a corrective to TIOBE. On another topic: I know that TIOBE sometimes lumps several related languages together. Does anyone know if they are doing that with "Lisp"? What does "Lisp" measure? Common Lisp? Scheme? Emacs lisp? Does it measure Clojure?
    - davidw 15y ago
      Someone can and has run with it: http://langpop.com http://langpop.com "Unfortunately", that someone now has a house, two kids, and more work than he can handle, and is thus looking to exit the fun and flame filled world of language popularity. Based on Instagram's valuation, I guess I'd settle for a million for it;-)
- thebluesky 15y ago
  Highly relevant: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3819221 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3819221
- blacksmythe 15y ago
  There are lots of kids programming in Lego Mindstorm. http://www.alaskapublic.org/2012/01/20/statewide-lego-robotics-competitions-open-to-spectators/ http://www.alaskapublic.org/2012/01/20/statewide-lego-roboti... "For the past four months, over 1,000 students across Alaska have been building robots – LEGO robots..." I imagine based on the fairly few (if enthusiastic) posts about Scala on HN that Lego Mindstorm programming far outstrips Scala programming in the US.
- soc88 15y ago
  The problem with Scala (and Haskell, too) is that the search phrase TIOBE uses doesn't take different naming schemes into account. For many functional languages "Programming in X" is a lot more common than "X programming" Compare "Scala programming" and "Haskell programming" with "Programming in Scala" and "Programming in Haskell." TIOBE is fully aware of the issue, but I guess the confusion and discussion creates just more clicks than an accurate representation.
mindcrime 15y ago
Yes, and in other news: While Aquarius is in the Seventh House of the Principal Equinox and Jupiter is aligned with Mercury and Thor is napping in the Trunk of a Ford Pinto, Java shall tremble at the Sight of the Blood running down the walls of Fear, for Clojure shall overcome Mindstorms when the Adjudicated Maximus crosses the Greater Chaotic Plane, and BOFH's everywhere shall rejoice! Ia, Ia!!! Chtulu Fthagn!! (IOW, no, I don't put much stock in the Tiobe index.)
- EliRivers 15y ago
  Right on. We all know C has always been the big one :)
shomyo 15y ago
fuck yeah
mrcharles 15y ago
Their methodology is suspect as hell: "TIOBE Programming Community Index is an indicator of the programming language trends. It is updated monthly, this list is based on the number of experienced programmers,courses and third-party vendors on the Internet. It uses the well-known search engines (such as Google, MSN, Yahoo) as well as Wikipedia and YouTube to calculate the ranking." Frankly that doesn't sound like a proper method to determine a ranking of anything, let alone programming languages.
- buro9 15y ago
  It is meant to be nothing but a trend indicator. Taken as such, and knowing that the methodology they use is flawed but mostly constant, then it actually works OK.
  - deleted 15y ago
    [deleted]
  - petdance 15y ago
    But a trend of what? I don't see how anyone can conclude "X is used more (for whatever 'more' means) than Y" simply because there are more documents on the web about X than Y.
    - buro9 15y ago
      From the TIOBE website: http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.... The TIOBE Programming Community index is an indicator of the popularity of programming languages. The index is updated once a month. The ratings are based on the number of skilled engineers world-wide, courses and third party vendors. The popular search engines Google, Bing, Yahoo!, Wikipedia, Amazon, YouTube and Baidu are used to calculate the ratings. Observe that the TIOBE index is not about the best programming language or the language in which most lines of code have been written. The index can be used to check whether your programming skills are still up to date or to make a strategic decision about what programming language should be adopted when starting to build a new software system. The definition of the TIOBE index can be found here. That last line points to the definition here: http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/tpci_definition.htm http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/tpci_d...
callumjones 15y ago
I'm curious to know what has happened in the VB.Net community that has encouraged such a huge shift upwards. Has Windows 8 dropping on the scene encouraged this?
gukjoon 15y ago
A bit of the ole Ralph Nadar effect going on here, I presume. Java's share is being cannibalized by Groovy, Scala, Clojure, etc. They should start making a JVM ranking to start consolidating all those languages.
- davesims 15y ago
  As Javascript's is cannibalized by node, jquery, ember, etc., etc., etc.
  - spullara 15y ago
    None of those are languages. CoffeeScript does come to mind though.
    - davesims 15y ago
      Yes, I understand those are frameworks not languages. The point was that since TIOBE indexes against the word 'javascript' and not 'node,' etc. I think it's possible that JavaScript's relative usage is obscured. This is purely anecdotal on my part but it seem to me I see many posts or articles talking about 'writing an app in node.js' or 'the UI was written in jQuery' rather than 'written in JavaScript.' This seems to me a phenomena more or less unique to JavaScript.
Aedan 15y ago
Excuse my apparent ignorance, but people are still programming in C? Why? On which fields? Is there something C can do better than Java or C#?
- tosseraccount 15y ago
  You're favorite virtual machine and OS are probably written in C (or some dialect thereof).
- ajb 15y ago
  Java and C# have 'managed' runtimes; it the language manages memory for you. This memory management bit cannot itself be written in the 'managed' language. Also, an operating system can't either[1]. Also, systems with hard real time requirements, such as audio/video, the signal processing code in your phone, wifi router, etc, are incompatible with almost all managed runtimes. [1] Okay, I know there are academic ones that are. As far as I know, no productions systems are.
  - pjmlp 15y ago
    Funny, because there are research compilers that do exactly that.
- jgw 15y ago
  Linux, UNIX variants, all their drivers, tons of embedded software & firmware in tiny devices like wireless chipsets, all the way up to the "real" IOS that runs Cisco switches. It's a good option for low-level work.
- w0utert 15y ago
  Embedded, low power, real-time, drivers, high performance computing, low-level kernel, legacy, and so on... The alternatives you give are not really the best examples either. C# is only a viable development platform for serious/professional work if you're targeting Windows, and if there is one language that doesn't do anything better than the many alternatives that compare favorably to it, it would be Java.
- 15y ago
eliben 15y ago
Please, please, stop with this TIOBE nonsense. This index is a joke - can't someone with a burning desire for a weekend project create an open-sourced index website and engage with other hackers to incrementally improve it?
- draegtun 15y ago
  The Transparent Language Popularity Index is an opensource alternative: http://lang-index.sourceforge.net/ http://lang-index.sourceforge.net/
  - spitfire 15y ago
    People are still using Eiffeil and Overon? All the other results I believe (Even clipper and module-2), but that is a bridge too far.
    - danvet 15y ago
      It's used to teach CS undergrads programming basics at ETH Zürich. At least a few years ago ...
      - UK-AL 15y ago
        Not surprised since Overon was invented there...
        pjmlp 15y ago
        It's called Oberon!
  - eliben 15y ago
    Thanks!
- davidw 15y ago
  LangPop.com is a lot better than TIOBE, but I'm not sure about open sourcing it... I'd kind of like to sell it for a bit of money and get out of running it (which I haven't actually been doing much of lately). The one thing I can't stand about TIOBE is not the index itself - it is what it is - but the breathless announcements about so and so overtaking this or that, like it's a horse race.
krollew 15y ago
I think that there is no need to check popularity of C and compare it to other ones. Even if C isn't most often used programming language anymore, it is and will be programming language number 1. Most popular languages are not realy different from C. Python, Ruby, PHP, Perl, Lisp - ok. those languages are different, OK. But C++, C# and Java are just C made bit more convienient tool for object oriented programming. Morover, if it isn't enough so much currently used software is written in C. Yeah, no doubt that C is programming language number 1.
- mikegirouard 15y ago
  PHP is very much akin to C. I wouldn't categorize it w/Ruby or Lisp.
  - krollew 15y ago
    Sure it's not not as different from C like Lisp is, but there are many differences. First of all: everything outside "<?php ?>" is treated as argument for print. Second, PHP is dynamicaly typed and support many functional language stuff like closures. In my opinion it's much more difference between C and PHP and between C and C#/Java.
lucasgonze 15y ago
TIOBE's methodology is skunky, but there's an underlying truth to the results. C really is that good.
st3fan 15y ago
The bigger news is that Objective-C went from 8th place to 4th.
noarchy 15y ago
Assuming that we trust these numbers, what does it say about mobile development that Obj-C continues to shoot up, while Java has lost momentum (though still high on the list)? There are more Android devices out there than iOS, but the development market seems skewed in favour of the latter.
- buster 15y ago
  You mean, despite that fact that Android is not actually Java(tm) and a lot of job offerings etc. may mention "Android Development" but not "Java Development", because they are in fact not the same, except for the syntax. As mentioned everywhere in the thread, the TIOBE index may not be optimal..
vicobt 15y ago
I didnt read everyones comments but i c an underlying trend hia. Mst of you are nt cnsidring dat maybe d rankin matrices r msred bsed on nt jst hw popular d lang is bt also on hw it ranks wit oda lngs in its paradim usin svrl fnctnl variabls.Lngs r nt borns equal.
petdance 15y ago
The title of the article is wrong. A correct title would be "The number of documents on the web about C is now larger than the number of documents on the web about Java." There is no reason to believe, and no facts are given to support the notion, that there is ANY correlation between popularity of a programming language and the number of web documents related to that language. TIOBE just leaves it to us to draw that conclusion ourselves, and then we commence arguing over it.

94 points by sonic0002 15y ago

apl 15y ago

So Scala ranks behind the Lego Mindstorms language and Visual FoxPro in terms of community popularity? Sure thing. I know that valid results don't always conform to expectations, anecdotal evidence and intuition; there's a believability limit, though, which is being crossed here. TIOBE may be measuring its thing correctly, but in that case it's measuring the wrong thing.

nknight 15y ago
It would strongly violate my expectations for Scala to be more popular than LabVIEW (which is NOT just "the Lego Mindstorms language") or Visual FoxPro. The "community" they're measuring is not the HN community, which is not even close to a representative sample of engineers worldwide.
- apl 15y ago
  > It would strongly violate my expectations for Scala to be > more popular than LabVIEW (which is NOT just "the Lego > Mindstorms language") I'm not talking about LabView; it's literally the Lego Mindstorms language [1] that outranks Erlang, MATLAB, ActionScript, Scheme, Groovy, R, Scala, and so Forth. LabView appears in the "Can't compare that meaningfully" category. So consider your expectations violated. > The "community" they're measuring is not the HN > community, which is not even close to a representative > sample of engineers worldwide. I understand the potential bubble effects at work. I'm not arguing that Scala or Clojure or whatever's hip should come out on top. What I'm contesting is their notion of popularity. The measurements may be reliable (I don't think they are), but they're sure as hell not measuring anything worthwhile. NXT-G may be more "popular" in the sense of being Googled more often, but that's utterly irrelevant for 99% of all cases where you'd be interested in language popularity. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lego_Mindstorms_NXT#NXT-G http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lego_Mindstorms_NXT#NXT-G
  - wvenable 15y ago
    > it's literally the Lego Mindstorms language [1] that outranks Erlang, MATLAB, ActionScript, Scheme, Groovy, R, Scala, and so Forth. I'm not sure why you're so surprised. I can see that it's quite likely that Lego Mindstorms is more popular and has more users than many of those languages. I don't yet have a Mindstorms set, but I've been considering it for a while -- I can't say the same for Clojure, Groovy, Scheme, or R.
  - vorg 15y ago
    Tiobe can easily be gamed. Look at OReilly's book sales to see a truer ranking of language popularity at http://radar.oreilly.com/2012/04/computer-book-market-2011-part4.html http://radar.oreilly.com/2012/04/computer-book-market-2011-p... The treemap is especially interesting. The square size shows market size, while the background color shows percentage change from previous year. E.g. both Scala and Clojure have green "increasing share" squares, while nearby Groovy and Labview have smaller, red "decreasing share" squares. Because people need to pay OReilly for the book, it's much more difficult to cheat than Tiobe, which only takes some "Project Manager" to spend half their day creating websites, generating cycles of links, producing online verbiage, submitting pages to search engines, blah blah blah
bad_user 15y ago
The TIOBE index is measuring the hits these languages get on Google, Blogger, Wikipedia, YouTube and other search engines. See: http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/tpci_definition.htm http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/tpci_d... It's easy to see how this measures the wrong thing. A better metric for me is the popularity of languages in open-source software, which could be measured by (say) the number of popular/active projects. For instance take a look at: https://github.com/languages https://github.com/languages ... but this also has flaws, because GitHub is favored in the Javascript/Ruby communities and open-source C#/.NET projects end up mostly on CodePlex, a lot of Java projects are hosted by Apache, a lot of Python projects are on BitBucket and so on. So a better metric would be to aggregate the projects from all popular project hosting services and count them, with some kind of weight attached. So for instance it would be unfair to count the lines of code in the Linux kernel, but it would also be unfair for the Linux kernel to have the same weight as some random project on GitHub that's being watched by 5 people. I would make this weight proportional to the number of active contributers, such that when a project is left unmaintained its weight will eventually drop to zero.
- MattJ100 15y ago
  Take a look at http://www.ohloh.net/languages http://www.ohloh.net/languages - you can sort by lines or commits.
- lkrubner 15y ago
  >So a better metric would be to aggregate the projects from > all popular project hosting services and count them, with > some kind of weight attached. Great idea. Do you think you might run with this idea? I like it as a corrective to TIOBE. On another topic: I know that TIOBE sometimes lumps several related languages together. Does anyone know if they are doing that with "Lisp"? What does "Lisp" measure? Common Lisp? Scheme? Emacs lisp? Does it measure Clojure?
  - davidw 15y ago
    Someone can and has run with it: http://langpop.com http://langpop.com "Unfortunately", that someone now has a house, two kids, and more work than he can handle, and is thus looking to exit the fun and flame filled world of language popularity. Based on Instagram's valuation, I guess I'd settle for a million for it;-)
thebluesky 15y ago
Highly relevant: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3819221 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3819221
blacksmythe 15y ago
There are lots of kids programming in Lego Mindstorm. http://www.alaskapublic.org/2012/01/20/statewide-lego-robotics-competitions-open-to-spectators/ http://www.alaskapublic.org/2012/01/20/statewide-lego-roboti... "For the past four months, over 1,000 students across Alaska have been building robots – LEGO robots..." I imagine based on the fairly few (if enthusiastic) posts about Scala on HN that Lego Mindstorm programming far outstrips Scala programming in the US.
soc88 15y ago
The problem with Scala (and Haskell, too) is that the search phrase TIOBE uses doesn't take different naming schemes into account. For many functional languages "Programming in X" is a lot more common than "X programming" Compare "Scala programming" and "Haskell programming" with "Programming in Scala" and "Programming in Haskell." TIOBE is fully aware of the issue, but I guess the confusion and discussion creates just more clicks than an accurate representation.

mindcrime 15y ago

Yes, and in other news: While Aquarius is in the Seventh House of the Principal Equinox and Jupiter is aligned with Mercury and Thor is napping in the Trunk of a Ford Pinto, Java shall tremble at the Sight of the Blood running down the walls of Fear, for Clojure shall overcome Mindstorms when the Adjudicated Maximus crosses the Greater Chaotic Plane, and BOFH's everywhere shall rejoice! Ia, Ia!!! Chtulu Fthagn!! (IOW, no, I don't put much stock in the Tiobe index.)

EliRivers 15y ago
Right on. We all know C has always been the big one :)

shomyo 15y ago

fuck yeah

mrcharles 15y ago

Their methodology is suspect as hell: "TIOBE Programming Community Index is an indicator of the programming language trends. It is updated monthly, this list is based on the number of experienced programmers,courses and third-party vendors on the Internet. It uses the well-known search engines (such as Google, MSN, Yahoo) as well as Wikipedia and YouTube to calculate the ranking." Frankly that doesn't sound like a proper method to determine a ranking of anything, let alone programming languages.

buro9 15y ago
It is meant to be nothing but a trend indicator. Taken as such, and knowing that the methodology they use is flawed but mostly constant, then it actually works OK.
- deleted 15y ago
  [deleted]
- petdance 15y ago
  But a trend of what? I don't see how anyone can conclude "X is used more (for whatever 'more' means) than Y" simply because there are more documents on the web about X than Y.
  - buro9 15y ago
    From the TIOBE website: http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.... The TIOBE Programming Community index is an indicator of the popularity of programming languages. The index is updated once a month. The ratings are based on the number of skilled engineers world-wide, courses and third party vendors. The popular search engines Google, Bing, Yahoo!, Wikipedia, Amazon, YouTube and Baidu are used to calculate the ratings. Observe that the TIOBE index is not about the best programming language or the language in which most lines of code have been written. The index can be used to check whether your programming skills are still up to date or to make a strategic decision about what programming language should be adopted when starting to build a new software system. The definition of the TIOBE index can be found here. That last line points to the definition here: http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/tpci_definition.htm http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/tpci_d...

callumjones 15y ago

I'm curious to know what has happened in the VB.Net community that has encouraged such a huge shift upwards. Has Windows 8 dropping on the scene encouraged this?

gukjoon 15y ago

A bit of the ole Ralph Nadar effect going on here, I presume. Java's share is being cannibalized by Groovy, Scala, Clojure, etc. They should start making a JVM ranking to start consolidating all those languages.

davesims 15y ago
As Javascript's is cannibalized by node, jquery, ember, etc., etc., etc.
- spullara 15y ago
  None of those are languages. CoffeeScript does come to mind though.
  - davesims 15y ago
    Yes, I understand those are frameworks not languages. The point was that since TIOBE indexes against the word 'javascript' and not 'node,' etc. I think it's possible that JavaScript's relative usage is obscured. This is purely anecdotal on my part but it seem to me I see many posts or articles talking about 'writing an app in node.js' or 'the UI was written in jQuery' rather than 'written in JavaScript.' This seems to me a phenomena more or less unique to JavaScript.

Aedan 15y ago

Excuse my apparent ignorance, but people are still programming in C? Why? On which fields? Is there something C can do better than Java or C#?

tosseraccount 15y ago
You're favorite virtual machine and OS are probably written in C (or some dialect thereof).
ajb 15y ago
Java and C# have 'managed' runtimes; it the language manages memory for you. This memory management bit cannot itself be written in the 'managed' language. Also, an operating system can't either[1]. Also, systems with hard real time requirements, such as audio/video, the signal processing code in your phone, wifi router, etc, are incompatible with almost all managed runtimes. [1] Okay, I know there are academic ones that are. As far as I know, no productions systems are.
- pjmlp 15y ago
  Funny, because there are research compilers that do exactly that.
jgw 15y ago
Linux, UNIX variants, all their drivers, tons of embedded software & firmware in tiny devices like wireless chipsets, all the way up to the "real" IOS that runs Cisco switches. It's a good option for low-level work.
w0utert 15y ago
Embedded, low power, real-time, drivers, high performance computing, low-level kernel, legacy, and so on... The alternatives you give are not really the best examples either. C# is only a viable development platform for serious/professional work if you're targeting Windows, and if there is one language that doesn't do anything better than the many alternatives that compare favorably to it, it would be Java.
15y ago

eliben 15y ago

Please, please, stop with this TIOBE nonsense. This index is a joke - can't someone with a burning desire for a weekend project create an open-sourced index website and engage with other hackers to incrementally improve it?

draegtun 15y ago
The Transparent Language Popularity Index is an opensource alternative: http://lang-index.sourceforge.net/ http://lang-index.sourceforge.net/
- spitfire 15y ago
  People are still using Eiffeil and Overon? All the other results I believe (Even clipper and module-2), but that is a bridge too far.
  - danvet 15y ago
    It's used to teach CS undergrads programming basics at ETH Zürich. At least a few years ago ...
    - UK-AL 15y ago
      Not surprised since Overon was invented there...
      - pjmlp 15y ago
        It's called Oberon!
- eliben 15y ago
  Thanks!
davidw 15y ago
LangPop.com is a lot better than TIOBE, but I'm not sure about open sourcing it... I'd kind of like to sell it for a bit of money and get out of running it (which I haven't actually been doing much of lately). The one thing I can't stand about TIOBE is not the index itself - it is what it is - but the breathless announcements about so and so overtaking this or that, like it's a horse race.

krollew 15y ago

I think that there is no need to check popularity of C and compare it to other ones. Even if C isn't most often used programming language anymore, it is and will be programming language number 1. Most popular languages are not realy different from C. Python, Ruby, PHP, Perl, Lisp - ok. those languages are different, OK. But C++, C# and Java are just C made bit more convienient tool for object oriented programming. Morover, if it isn't enough so much currently used software is written in C. Yeah, no doubt that C is programming language number 1.

mikegirouard 15y ago
PHP is very much akin to C. I wouldn't categorize it w/Ruby or Lisp.
- krollew 15y ago
  Sure it's not not as different from C like Lisp is, but there are many differences. First of all: everything outside "<?php ?>" is treated as argument for print. Second, PHP is dynamicaly typed and support many functional language stuff like closures. In my opinion it's much more difference between C and PHP and between C and C#/Java.

lucasgonze 15y ago

TIOBE's methodology is skunky, but there's an underlying truth to the results. C really is that good.

st3fan 15y ago

The bigger news is that Objective-C went from 8th place to 4th.

noarchy 15y ago

Assuming that we trust these numbers, what does it say about mobile development that Obj-C continues to shoot up, while Java has lost momentum (though still high on the list)? There are more Android devices out there than iOS, but the development market seems skewed in favour of the latter.

buster 15y ago
You mean, despite that fact that Android is not actually Java(tm) and a lot of job offerings etc. may mention "Android Development" but not "Java Development", because they are in fact not the same, except for the syntax. As mentioned everywhere in the thread, the TIOBE index may not be optimal..

vicobt 15y ago

I didnt read everyones comments but i c an underlying trend hia. Mst of you are nt cnsidring dat maybe d rankin matrices r msred bsed on nt jst hw popular d lang is bt also on hw it ranks wit oda lngs in its paradim usin svrl fnctnl variabls.Lngs r nt borns equal.

petdance 15y ago

The title of the article is wrong. A correct title would be "The number of documents on the web about C is now larger than the number of documents on the web about Java." There is no reason to believe, and no facts are given to support the notion, that there is ANY correlation between popularity of a programming language and the number of web documents related to that language. TIOBE just leaves it to us to draw that conclusion ourselves, and then we commence arguing over it.