2 ms·
my case for good-looking history is pride of ownership. Are you proud of this "thing that makes money and ultimately pays your paycheck" or do you leave it poll
by gosub100 3y ago
my case for good-looking history is pride of ownership. Are you proud of this "thing that makes money and ultimately pays your paycheck" or do you leave it polluted and full of crumbs and detritus?
I would have made this part of a root-level comment but I doubt anyone would read it, but: I think what gets lost in all these git debates is what language/context are we talking about? a shop that churns out javascript and releases to prod every 8 hours is very different than a C++ shop that writes safety-critical software. Their git needs are very different, and having an "I make my bed every day at 5:30am before I go for a 5mi run and come back and drink my juice and eat avocado toast" git regimen may be appropriate for some codebases but not for others where "I woke up hungover at 10am with a partner whose name I cannot remember, in a bed that is not mine" regimen. I think countless human-brain cycles are lost to bickering between these 2 camps.