> turn out to be mostly true Nope, it was still pseudoscientific at the time, even if it gained scientific evidence later. Wikipedia is a purveyor of facts, n

> turn out to be mostly true Nope, it was still pseudoscientific at the time, even if it gained scientific evidence later. Wikipedia is a purveyor of facts, not of judgments, but sometimes the two are inseparable. As long as it's a fact, it's ok if it's implicitly a judgment too.