3 ms·
Yes, as I stated above, the judge ruled against Apple's anti-steering provision. But that is a small win in light of the other rulings. It's also tied up in cou
by willseth 3y ago
Yes, as I stated above, the judge ruled against Apple's anti-steering provision. But that is a small win in light of the other rulings. It's also tied up in courts on appeal, so nothing has actually gone into effect. Even if the anti-anti-steering ruling is eventually upheld, I suspect all that will end up being allowed is stating the alternative pricing, not actually integrating linking and payment via redirects between web and app.
- leereeves 3y ago> It's also tied up in courts on appeal, so nothing has actually gone into effect. The rulings against Epic are also being appealed, so by that standard it would still be wrong to say that Epic lost.
- willseth 3y agoHuh? That's not even the point. If that is upheld, it will still be an significant and overall loss for Epic. Apple's request for a stay on appeal could have been denied too, but it wasn't, so the appeals court at least doesn't see it as obviously working out in Epic's favor.