3 ms·
"Any barrier for US persons’ participation will only slow American progress in developing and adopting this technology. It will have an effect opposite of that
by m12k 3y ago
"Any barrier for US persons’ participation will only slow American progress in developing and adopting this technology. It will have an effect opposite of that intended by lawmakers."
Sounds like the letter/blog post already does make this point?
- tcgv 3y agoIt does. However, if this point were more central to the letter, it would have a greater impact on the reader. For instance, explicitly demonstrating the numerous ways in which American progress could be impeded, explaining how China and Chinese business owners could get ahead in RISC-V technology, and maybe drawing an analogy with the restrictions imposed on federal funding for stem cell research that affected the US in the global landscape [1], among other examples. Frequently, politicians prioritize their personal agendas and interests, so it's essential to thoroughly address those aspects. PS: I'm not a US national, so I'm only analyzing the topic rather than engaging in it. [1] https://hsci.harvard.edu/impact-federal-policy-global-competition-stem-cell-research https://hsci.harvard.edu/impact-federal-policy-global-compet...