See also: - https://aisnakeoil.substack.com/p/the-bait-and-switch-behind-ai-risk https://aisnakeoil.substack.com/p/the-bait-and-switch-behind... - https://predi

See also: - https://aisnakeoil.substack.com/p/the-bait-and-switch-behind-ai-risk https://aisnakeoil.substack.com/p/the-bait-and-switch-behind... - https://predictive-optimization.cs.princeton.edu/ https://predictive-optimization.cs.princeton.edu/ But see https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364922000292 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026736492... > human oversight policies provide a false sense of security in > adopting algorithms and enable vendors and agencies to shirk > accountability for algorithmic harms. > propose a shift from human oversight to institutional oversight as > the central mechanism for regulating government algorithms. > First, agencies must justify that it is appropriate to incorporate > an algorithm into decision-making and that any proposed forms of > human oversight are supported by empirical evidence. Second, these > justifications must receive democratic review and approval before > the agency can adopt the algorithm. Also https://predictive-optimization.cs.princeton.edu/ https://predictive-optimization.cs.princeton.edu/