I don't think the Apple case sets a precedent, because that court didn't say that Apple wasn't a monopolist. > “The court does not find that it is impossible;

I don't think the Apple case sets a precedent, because that court didn't say that Apple wasn't a monopolist. > “The court does not find that it is impossible; only that Epic Games failed in its burden to demonstrate Apple is an illegal monopolist,” [U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers] wrote. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/09/10/apple-epic-decision-judge-market-monopoly/?itid=lk_inline_manual_16 https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/09/10/apple-e...